Every critical check requires evidence. No more trusting that a checklist means the work was done.
A proof-based audit requires evidence – live photos, timestamps, or on-site verification – on critical checks before they can be marked complete. This means a completed checklist reflects what actually happened at the location, not what a manager assumed or remembered. Evidence is captured in the moment, linked to the specific check, and attached to the audit record for review and reference.
At one or two locations, management can personally verify most standards. As you add locations, that direct oversight becomes impossible. Without evidence requirements, reported compliance and actual compliance diverge – often gradually and invisibly. Standards drift while audit scores stay stable. Proof-based audits close that gap by making evidence a requirement, not an option.
Teams can mark tasks complete without doing the work – not necessarily out of dishonesty, but because self-reported checklists under time pressure tend toward optimism. Issues stay hidden until a customer complaint or a failed inspection surfaces them. By that point, the drift has often been building for months across multiple locations.
Audiment requires live photo or video evidence on critical checks – captured through the app, not uploaded from a photo library. Failed checks automatically generate tracked issues with assigned owners and due dates. Every audit creates a verifiable trail by location, auditor, and date that can be reviewed by area managers and leadership without site visits.
Proof-based audits give you data you can trust. Reliable data shows you where issues are recurring – so you catch problems before they escalate. Leadership can make resourcing and intervention decisions based on what is actually happening at each location rather than what is being reported.
No. Evidence is required only on critical checks – typically 5–15% of checklist items. For a 50-item audit, that means approximately 5–8 photos. Most teams complete this in under 2 additional minutes. The efficiency impact is minimal; the accountability impact is significant.
No. Audiment requires live camera capture – photos taken through the app at the time of the audit. Uploads from photo libraries are not accepted for critical checks. This prevents backdating and ensures evidence reflects the actual inspection moment.
Store managers, area managers, and leadership use it at different levels. Store managers see their own audit performance. Area managers review evidence quality and recurring failures across their territory. Leadership uses aggregated data to identify systemic issues and allocation priorities.
Evidence requirements are configured per checklist template. Typically, food safety temperatures, cleaning standards, safety compliance checks, and brand-critical execution require evidence. Routine administrative confirmations can remain as yes/no responses.